While the publication of both single- and multi-author studies of composers in their anniversary years has become a predictable part of today’s musicological landscape, such works still have their uses. If this is less apparent in the case of some of the biggest names, where suspicions of overkill or ‘cashing in’ may well be raised, the practice can be more readily justified for that vast majority of less celebrated — and commercially less attractive — composers. Marking anniversaries in such a ...